Today we begin to wrap up our tour of the Portage Lake smelters by visiting the newest and most modern, the Michigan Smelter.
The last of the Portage Lake smelting works was the Michigan Smelter, considered by many to represent the pinnacle of smelting technology in the Lake Superior region. Like Quincy only a few years before, the Copper Range Consolidated Company determined the need for a company-owned smelter in 1903. As such, the Michigan Smelting Company was quickly organized, with 60% of the company’s stock owned by the Champion, Trimountain, and Baltic Mines and the remaining 40% in the hands of the Wolverine, Atlantic, and Mohawk Mines. In July of 1903 F.I. Cairns, previously the superintendent of the Anaconda Smelter in Montana, was hired to plan and oversee construction on the new works. Copper Range contracted with the Northern Construction Company to build an office building, laboratory, powerhouse, machine shop, and mineral storage bins on the site of the old Atlantic stamp mill on Cole’s Creek, west of Houghton.
Smelting operations began in early 1904, with disappointing results. However, 1905 brought increased efficiency and productivity to the smelter, and in 1906 Copper Range built a new electrical generating station on the site which provided for all of the company’s electrical needs beyond powering the shaft hoists and compressors.[i] During this early period the smelter reached the height of its expansion and growth. Drawing heavily upon stamp mill design, the smelter was built in a multilevel terrace design, utilizing gravity to move copper rock and molten mineral through the works. Raw mineral arrived on the uppermost level of the smelter via the Copper Range Railroad, which dumped copper rock into 3,000 ton storage bins. Coal and other fuels were also delivered to storage bins on the upper terrace. To begin smelting, the mineral passed downward through rotary dryers powered by exhaust from the furnaces below. Once dry, the mineral entered the main 160 by 205 foot furnace building, which ultimately contained six reverberatories. Initially, the furnaces were constructed on a massive scale, 18 by 50 feet, but these dimensions quickly proved problematic and were reduced in size. Apart from heating the mineral dryers, the furnaces also powered three boilers before passing up the hill and venting out of a 150 foot tall stack at the top of the smelter complex.[ii]
After the initial melting in the reverberatories, molten copper flowed downhill through a 21 foot launder to two refining furnaces prior to casting. The reverberatory slag, meanwhile, was treated in the typical manner in two cupolas. Housed in a 40 by 70 foot blast furnace building, these cupolas produced molded ingots which were transferred by an electric crane to the refining furnaces for remelting. The cupola slag was cast into 1,000 pound cakes and carried by electric trams to a large Blake jaw crusher, which produced a finely-ground sand which was hydraulically ejected into Portage Lake.[iii] Thanks to these and other automated features, such as electric travelling cranes, pneumatic hoists, and large grain silo-like storage bins, the Michigan Smelter proved highly efficient. For instance, in August 1905 a 10-man crew worked one of the furnaces for seven hours, during which time they cast 292,000 pounds of refined copper, which was then collected at the bottom of the complex for shipment to the Houghton docks on the Copper Range Railroad. This feat broke an existing world record, and proved that despite some initial difficulties, the Michigan Smelter was a competitive and successful venture.[iv]
A casting wheel and furnace.
[i] Van Pelt, J. Robert (attributed). “Michigan Smelting Company, 1903-1952.”
[ii] Stevens, Horace J. The Copper Handbook: A Manual of the Copper Industry of the World. Vol. 6, 1906, pg. 683-84; Vol. 11, 1912-13, pg.586-87.
[iii] Rickard, T.A. “Smelting Practice-Chapter XIII.” The Copper Mines of Lake Superior. Pgs. 142-147.
[iv] Stevens, Horace J. The Copper Handbook: A Manual of the Copper Industry of the World. Vol. 6, 1906, pg. 683-84